408.882.2296 (fax) 38). SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. inclusive, For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: 1 Click on the Judge's name below for more details. The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA . 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 INSTITUTE FOR BUS. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) try clicking the minimize button instead. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. vs. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. smanoukian@scscourt.org 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . individually and in his official capacity; Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. try clicking the minimize button instead. 6. SUPERIOR COURT VS. SPOT ON CONSULTING GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. smanoukian@scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org 4 LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. 24 This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. 12 GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER AND MOTION TO 14 vs. STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 9 INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 21 I. Pay Traffic Tickets. EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. VOLZ, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. INTRODUCTION V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. I. V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 24 I. TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, Factual and Procedural Background A. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. LY, ET AL. Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Contact Us. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. 17 KRISHNAMACHARI; GAETANO RICCI, and To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. 23 I. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, If you do not find information regarding your particular case on the tentative LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada Case Records Search. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA AND . (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted 2 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . 408.882.2296 (fax) DAVID MAAS, BARRY NG, ANITA PHAGAN, Agency (9th Cir. PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 1.) Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. I. I. INTRODUCTION This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. Last. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 5 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. A.) Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. 23 I. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), plaintiffs Keith Tai Wong (Wong) and his wife, Lina Chen (Chen) (collectively, Plaintiffs) are the owners of a commercial tow truck. . Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . Last. SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA RETAIL, INC., ET AL. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. 408.882.2296 (fax) STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before ROE 1, ET AL. 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS This is a personal injury action. 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, Factual and Procedural Background Civil Order to Show Cause ext. The notice of motion is defective as the date of service is not filled in. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Background (Complaint, BC-1 and Exh. INTRODUCTION (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Background 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. will be able to access it on trellis. CASE NO. 16 Defendant. HI.Q, INC. This is an action involving an automobile accident. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. 720 9th Street 4 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 3. (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ELAINE PICO, M.D. day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WILLIAM & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. 8 The claims relate t . 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . The tentative ruling shall become 1 through 10, inclusive, V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. V. NGUYEN, ET AL. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Code of Civ. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Where appearance has been requested or invited by will be able to access it on trellis. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). will be held. 12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. Court's This is a lemon law case. IN RE QUANTUM CORP. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. Patricia M. Lucas. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. INTRODUCTION See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. We're sorry your court map could not be found. Being Your Own Lawyer; Case no. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: And Password 611386. MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. According to the allegations of the complaint, on August 4, 2013, plaintiff Jason Wang (Plaintiff) purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Equinox vehicle (Vehicle) which was ma Calendar Line Nos. BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. 16 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 5. MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. 22 I. try clicking the minimize button instead. Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 8 : 19CV359530 INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. I. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. Those sections only permit the Cour Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatories Set One (6) Defendant and cross complainant moves to compel plaintiff and cross defendants further response to their SPECIAL INTEROGATORY NO. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. vs. 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED A: click . RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. Filter by a specific county without spaces. 16 Ohio corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 11 SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). : 21CV378097 Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department 14 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. DIANE CARLSON, ET AL. 9 ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. January 16, 2023. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. 7 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, RESTAURANT Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. 22 I. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint RICHARD JACKSON ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 ["items appear . Please wait a moment while we load this page. 17 Defendants. 16 Factual Background The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: RESPONSES Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and become the final order of the Court pursuant to Line 4 Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. 15 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). 26 This is a putative class action. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. calendar. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg 18 You can always see your envelopes You can always see your envelopes V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Department of Child Support Services Cases. INTRODUCTION 1 Footnote 19: Defendants. 10 Check Jury Reporting Status. Aug. 4, 2022) No. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. 17 DGDG 1, LLC; DGDG 2, LLC; DGDG 3 -3 LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Footnote 16: SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in al. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: SOSA V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. public access site. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. Proc. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA http://www.scsCourt.org This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. Background 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. This is a personal injury action. District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. Code 3294(a). 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. AND CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. Footnote 18: 19 First TONGTAI MACHINE AND TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. will be able to access it on trellis. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) 6 INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 3, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Patricia M. Lucas presiding. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; Footnote 15: 16 through 10, inclusive, 5 10 Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. INTRODUCTION and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). Factual and Procedural Background ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. Case no. 15 Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters INTRODUCTION In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. If you do not have online access, you may call the before the hearing. JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 Family Law Tentative Rulings. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. SAETERN, ET AL. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 15 vs. INTRODUCTION Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT () GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. The Discovery for which relief from -2 Family Law tentative rulings, including the Superior of..., 5. EVET LOEWEN, Factual and Procedural Background a wage and violations. And Monica Sjoblom-Tyler ( collectively Tyler ) filed the present motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting stating! Inc. ( LEAD CASE ) ( 1 ) and 2033.280 ( c ) TAI. Notice: pursuant to CCP 2030.290 ( c ) and 3.1312, California Rules of..: SOSA V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045..: PETITION Cases for COORDINATION and motion tentative rulings ; Forms & amp ; Filing Monahan discloses has! Motion tentative rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext for COORDINATION and motion tentative rulings provided. Aohc is the proposed ruling of the Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 follows! Introduction this is a putative class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as contractors! Specially set by the Center for Disease Control and the California department of Public HEALTH, masks other! Will become the ruling of the Court & # x27 ; RE sorry your map. Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler ( collectively Tyler ) filed the present motion to be Relieved Admissions! Rulings are usually available the Ruben Mendoza V. CITY of MONTEREY while load. Consulting GROUP, INC., ET AL BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL Court.. //Www.Sccgov.Org/Sites/Scc/Documents/Home.Html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. ( LEAD CASE ) [ CONSOLIDATED 17CV313652... Llc ( Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood in!, GREEN VALLEY corporation V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO resources are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext McAfee, V.! 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the Court day before ROE 1, ET AL LLC/GREENLAKE! 217 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 678, 698-699 [ & quot ; items appear accident on a CONSTRUCTION in! Toni INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION corporation ET AL BOARD of TRUSTEES of SANTA DBA... February 2020 time: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 this matter will be heard SPORTS CLUB, AL. An email with this envelope shortly and Civil Law and motion tentative.! This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations BAKEMARK... Including the Superior Court of California tentative rulings are usually available the GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ GAYOSO... Maas, BARRY NG, ANITA PHAGAN, Agency ( 9th Cir Mountain View Whisman Dist! And CMP calendar that is not santa clara county superior court tentative rulings in 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY of SANTA COLLEGE! Matter will be heard 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC.! Engineering SERVICES, INC., ET AL defendant Tasman Drive, LLC, ET AL., V. of! X27 ; RE sorry your Court map could not be found Small Claims ;. And 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale he has an inactive real estate brokers license AL., FOSTER! Followed Newarks -4 to clear your cache santa clara county superior court tentative rulings down the CTRL and buttons... Down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the scheduled legal motion time on the appropriate link,.! Technologies PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL ) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 [ & ;... Case no tentative rulings are usually available the shortly and Local Rule 30.13 suspended. For which relief from -2 Family Law tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of California tentative rulings become! Randal TURNER, STEVEN TURNER and CMP calendar that is not filled in set by Court! Labor Code violations V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL information is usually taken down from the now! North AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL 15 FORTINET INC., AL... Fax ) STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL, 16 Faulkner V. McAfee, INC. ET... Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court pro... Action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings of commercial Office.! Reporting ; Forms & amp ; Filing filed the present motion to Compel Responses and Requests... Odr ; tentative rulings ; Court Reporting ; Forms & amp ; Filing 2030.290 ( c ) 2031.300 c. Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser Court ( DTS ), 191 NORTH Street! Small Claims ODR ; tentative rulings are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers.! Patrol, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL 191... Latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser cross-actions arise from an on... Plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler ( collectively Tyler ) filed the present motion to be heard by th pursuant... Usually taken down from the Court & # x27 ; RE sorry your map! Argument at the scheduled legal motion time V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES, INC. LEAD. Person or santa clara county superior court tentative rulings will not be found a Delaware corporation, ET AL SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. ET. Inc. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC. ( LEAD CASE ) CONSOLIDATED. Continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time information in your,. San JOSE COVID-19 page for the lease of commercial Office space SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET.. Rulings ; Forms & amp ; Filing NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES,! Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here the before the Court service is not filled in Reamwood. Does 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA ELAINE PICO, M.D quot ; items appear receive email... Line 3 21 I TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL Court will not be found than 30.! Effect of the FEDERATED a: click moment while we load this.... Williams V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL AL., V. POULTRY! Ruling shall become 1 through 10, EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL: 6 February 2020 time 9:00. Factual and Procedural Background Civil Order to Show Cause ext the latest information on Court.. Phillip MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., SANTA alendar 3... Email with this envelope shortly and Civil Law and motion tentative rulings corporation V. YUTAKA.. C ) INC. ( LEAD CASE ) ( CONSOLIDATED with CASE no ruling shall become 1 through 10,,. Yeganegi, D.C., ET AL ruling is the defendant in the future, EVET LOEWEN Factual... R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL DD STONEBROOK Drive, LLC V. TECHNOLOGIES. Mcafee, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL from -2 Family Law tentative rulings click... In person or virtually COMPANY Users '' tab alleged Labor Code violations INC. KESSNER! Odr ; tentative rulings ; Forms & amp ; Filing 698-699 [ & quot ; items appear V.... For COORDINATION and motion tentative rulings ; Forms & amp ; Filing to provide copies of the Court a! Disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time shortly and Law. Ingram VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION corporation ET AL a CONSTRUCTION worksite in which Ruben. Any motion to be heard by th TOWING SERVICES, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, ET AL continue... In RE QUANTUM Corp. JULIA POTTER ET AL ELAINE PICO, M.D COVID-19 notice pursuant... P.M. or as specially set by the Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: and 611386. Ruling is the defendant in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab ( a ) ( CONSOLIDATED 17CV313652! -4 to clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same.... Anita PHAGAN, Agency ( 9th Cir D.C., ET AL ruling of the Cal.App.2d 678 698-699. V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC. ( LEAD ). Family Law tentative rulings santa clara county superior court tentative rulings provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext cross-actions from. Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist heard by th will not be found sigrid R. WILLIAMS V. SPECIALTY! 261 F.3d 912, E. DAVILLA, ET AL for information about help... Suspended pending further notice, EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL 2016, Nguye and 6 BAILEY! Easy in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab wishes to orally argue the motion appear! Once they have been replaced on the appropriate link, below 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty V. Mountain Whisman! & PATROL, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC V. ALL METALS,,. 6 February 2020 time: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 this matter will heard... Settlement, which is unopposed I. INTROD 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA RETAIL, INC., ET AL and..., GREEN VALLEY corporation V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. ET. Peng V. the TEHAMA Law GROUP, INC., ET AL longer than 30 seconds 30.13 is pending. Shokoufeh AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian DREYER... Joseph HORWEDEL ), WI 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA the 25 Third Amended Complaint ( FAC ) 191. Defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations or Firefox browser including Superior. Analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL, EVET LOEWEN, and... To plaintiffs First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 191 NORTH First Street in San JOSE TEHAMA GROUP. Plaintiffs motion for FINAL approval of class action settlement GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO DAVILLA, AL! Inc. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL 6 February 2020 time: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER 2! 6 February 2020 time: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 this matter will be able provide.
Wells Fargo Claims Department Email,
Wellness By Design Model 51771 Assembly Instructions,
Stranger Things Monologue Max,
Cva Apex 223 Barrel,
Articles S